The Two Castles 10k went…. Ok.
Two Castles is a 10k run between Warwick Castle and Kenilworth Castle. It’s a nice idea with two main disadvantages: 1. Kenilworth is about 40m higher than Warwick so it’s really the wrong way around, and 2. There’s not a lot of shade on the roads between them.
As is becoming tradition, it was a race day so the weather was really hot. There were a few familiar faces from parkrun there so we were standing around before hand, chatting in the grounds of Warwick Castle. Castles tend to have quite wide courtyard areas and relatively short walls, which means they aren’t very shady. I could feel my exposed skin getting baked even at 8:30 in the morning. The past few runs have been unusually warm for the time of year, but I think we’re now in official heat wave territory. I have to credit the organisers with handling it well, though. Compared to the Solihull half marathon, which I ran last August during a heatwave, there were more water stations and a lot more marshalls around.
Unlike on some previous races, my death-wish tolerance was quite low this time so I took it pretty steady and ran just under 48 minutes. Last weekend I did a 13k at 4:30/km, this one was 10k at 4:45/km. So that’s quite a bit slower. I decided that if I raced it, I might hit 45 minutes (which I wouldn’t even be happy with for a race effort anyway) and I’d feel grim for the next day or two. So I kept it at more of a mid tempo effort and felt all the better for it. It was actually very congested anyway, not helped by the weather causing people to slow down all the way along the course and walk up hills, so even at a more sedate pace I was having to weave around people the whole way, which meant I was expending a bit more energy than I should have been for the pace.

I think I made the right choice. One of my Strava enemies rivals friends who finished less than a minute behind me on the 13km last weekend ran it in 45:30 but said she felt sick the whole way. Been there, done that, this way was much better.
The hills weren’t too bad. Maybe I’m just getting better at them. A lot of people walking them whereas to me they felt alright. It was quite an undulating route with a lot of gradual climbing. Anything steep was pretty short lived.



So anyway, let’s talk about ground contact time balance. This was the worst one yet, with 54.7% of my ground contact time on the right foot. 54.7% maybe doesn’t sound that bad looking at percentage points, but in terms of actual percentage difference it means I spent 20% more time on my right foot than my left, and that’s a lot!
I don’t want to read too much into one reading though. I’m using the Garmin Running Dynamics Pod, which clips onto the back of my shorts. I suspect that if it’s not perfectly centred it’ll bias it one way or the other, so it’s more something you have to look at in terms of trends rather than single data points. Regardless, it fits with my suspicion that I tend to rely on my right leg for power a lot more, which is going to show up on faster runs and hills.
In doing a few easy runs since, I’ve found that my left hip flexor is tight (well I knew that already) and I tend to move nearer to 50% if I really focus on pushing against that tightness through my stride. Yesterday I did a run that that was roughly 50-50 for the first few kilometres, which I think is because I did some squats and hip hikes to warm up. There’s lots to work on.


